<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GolfBallSelector.com tests TaylorMade Penta TP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.golfballtest.org/index.php?feed=rss2&#038;p=502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.golfballtest.org/?p=502</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:49:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Raymond Andrew Cuffey</title>
		<link>http://www.golfballtest.org/?p=502&#038;cpage=1#comment-2611</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Andrew Cuffey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.golfballtest.org/?p=502#comment-2611</guid>
		<description>Very informative and helpful site. Can only help the average gofer to improve his game!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very informative and helpful site. Can only help the average gofer to improve his game!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hidden Tester</title>
		<link>http://www.golfballtest.org/?p=502&#038;cpage=1#comment-2606</link>
		<dc:creator>Hidden Tester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.golfballtest.org/?p=502#comment-2606</guid>
		<description>I got a chance to test this ball early, but only on wedges... as that is my specialty. So this is the only area I will comment on in specific. Overall I found this ball ball a solid tour ball. You have to have the swing-speed, and great control of your swing speed to take full advantage of drivers, hybrids, fairway woods, and irons.  

As for the short game. Starting with 49° I started to see a big difference in the type of shots that would generate spin. Basically, it was bump and run for all types of tight shots, but there was ample spin on full swing shots. This left me sort of confused... The ball really is not workable in close. This ball is really designed for tour pros, who our needed to play the new groove rule. Mainly those are already shorter off the tee, and who normally play a full wedge. 

Amatuers have no business trying to play this ball. Nor do Tour players who have any issues with distance either. 

Expect 5 piece balls to do 3 things. 1. Be tailored to specific group on the tour. 2. Give the non-conforming ball makers something very special R&amp;D insight to give more of the general public to care less about the USGA 3. Disappear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a chance to test this ball early, but only on wedges&#8230; as that is my specialty. So this is the only area I will comment on in specific. Overall I found this ball ball a solid tour ball. You have to have the swing-speed, and great control of your swing speed to take full advantage of drivers, hybrids, fairway woods, and irons.  </p>
<p>As for the short game. Starting with 49° I started to see a big difference in the type of shots that would generate spin. Basically, it was bump and run for all types of tight shots, but there was ample spin on full swing shots. This left me sort of confused&#8230; The ball really is not workable in close. This ball is really designed for tour pros, who our needed to play the new groove rule. Mainly those are already shorter off the tee, and who normally play a full wedge. </p>
<p>Amatuers have no business trying to play this ball. Nor do Tour players who have any issues with distance either. </p>
<p>Expect 5 piece balls to do 3 things. 1. Be tailored to specific group on the tour. 2. Give the non-conforming ball makers something very special R&amp;D insight to give more of the general public to care less about the USGA 3. Disappear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hatley</title>
		<link>http://www.golfballtest.org/?p=502&#038;cpage=1#comment-2605</link>
		<dc:creator>hatley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.golfballtest.org/?p=502#comment-2605</guid>
		<description>I would like to test these golf balls out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to test these golf balls out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey Shriver</title>
		<link>http://www.golfballtest.org/?p=502&#038;cpage=1#comment-2604</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey Shriver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.golfballtest.org/?p=502#comment-2604</guid>
		<description>I would love to try your golf balls.  Is it possible you could send me a free sample? I&#039;ve been using Bridgestone for a long time now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to try your golf balls.  Is it possible you could send me a free sample? I&#8217;ve been using Bridgestone for a long time now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
